NOW COMES the defendant, by pro se, and asks the court according to Judicial and Attorney Rules of Conduct and Freedom of Information Acts, to provide the Defendant with all of the paper trail in this case that she has requested in her motions to date and states:

1. That the defendant presently is charged with the offense of harassment by telephone, 720 ILCS 135/1-1.
2. That the defendant has lived in fear and loathing, under great stress since on or about September 24, 1999 and underwent great physical, mental and emotional suffering, provable by medical authorities and common sense.
3. That the relatives and friends of the defendant have undergone worry, strain, stress and trouble over the troubles of the defendant, especially her elderly, ailing and recently widowed mother.
4. That we live in a so-called democracy, where officers of the state are accountable to the people paying their salaries, not in a third world country such as Peru and/or a Third Reich country such as Nazi era Germany where people are "disappeared" and sent off to dungeons without due process and with impunity upon those responsible for such inequities.
5. That the defendant in several motions to the court has requested information about the charges brought against her and the people and processes used to bring these charges against her, information that is COMPULSORY, yet to date has received NOTHING.
6. That the defendant has spent hundreds of dollars in actual expenses of her own defense and thousands of dollars in innumerable hours in defending herself, while needing that time to continue her struggle with her thieving ex-boss and to search for new employment for unlike her thieving ex-boss complainant, the defendant NEEDS to work for a living while the complainant works obviously, blatantly, loudly and notoriously for wants, desires, ego-gratification and the need to lust for more.
7. That the defendant not only wants this information and deserves this information, she is entitled to it by right, by man's law in these United States of America, land of the free and home of the brave, and by God's law, both of which this court also claims to live by.
8. That the defendant will seek other methods to get this information, including but not limited to pursuing Freedom of Information orders.
9. That the defendant will be seeking restitution from the state for its malicious and selective prosecution against her and will consider stonewalling on receiving paper in this case as further cause for damages.
10. That the defendant does not view this inequity against her as the prosecutors seem to consider it, a little "harmless prosecution", but rather she has suffered great harm, including the harm and trauma of opening unhealed wounds which she sustained and suffered from in the past due to unscrupulous attorneys and malicious, selective and powerfully immune and protected prosecutors during Operation Greylord years.
11. That by blatant and obvious declarations, nearly everyone involved in this prosecution considers him or herself either a devout Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu or other similar devotee of God, yet are committing acts that neither Jesus Christ, Moses, Mohammed, Buddha nor any other spiritual icon would ever do by beating up on, harassing and intimidating an honest, small-time worker little guy for seeking redress through the State's prosecution apparatus, public opinion and through the conscience of the thieving complainant and his co-conspirators, however deeply these consciences are buried under lifelong and learned sadistic, depraved and twisted behavioral patterns.
12. The defendant claims innocence of the charge of harassment by telephone to one person at one telephone number, claims her intent was only and solely to retrieve her stolen commissions and other rightful monies owed from an arrogant and obscenely wealthy, imperialist psychopath while the prosecutor for the State on January 27, 2000 warned her against other activities for which she has not even been charged with such as trespassing and for sending black full-page faxes to a different phone number as indicated on the charging document, creating a confusion by the defendant of what she is charged with and what is considered illegal and what is not.
13. Further confounding the confusion of the defendant, who was born and bred on the propaganda of having GUARANTEED constitutional rights including that to free speech, about what is legal and what is illegal, the complainant and several of his associates have committed blatant and obvious crimes, even to the common man in the street, but have never been charged on anything by the prosecutorial professionals.
14. The prosecutors for Illinois and Cook County who had their door opened wide by the complainant to do a full and competent investigation as they are sworn by law and codes of ethics to do, failed to find that the complainant committed conspiratorial illegal acts against the defendant and the defendant, as a taxpayer and long law-abiding citizen now subject to PROSECUTION, has a right to know the whys and wherefores of this failure.
15. In this so far Kafka-esque "The Trial" experience on what her supposed unlawful acts were, the defendant doesn't consider that she committed any and will continue her social activist attempts against owners, officers, managers and others of Wrox press until either she wins, dies or decides on her own sovereign and individual rights judgment, and not upon the state's with its unlimited powers of coercion and intimidation, to use the civil courts to pursue a settlement.
16. The defendant reiterates, highlights, announces, loudly and notoriously proclaims that she does not agree to the terms of the Dismissal with State on Leave.

WHEREFORE, the defendant moves this court to grant the motion of SHOWING THE PAPER in this case.