Status of Motion: Filed, Served January 30, 2000.

 

 

 

 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS

The People of State of Illinois,

Plaintiff

v.

Gale A

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 

 

No. 99329469

MOTION FOR COURT
TO RECOMMEND PROSECUTION REVIEW ITS
INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS AND CURE ITS DEFECTS OF SELECTIVE PROSECUTION
BY CHARGING ADAM MACLEAN AND AMY MACLEAN (NEE GREENMAN)

NOW COMES the defendant, by pro se, and asks the court according to Judicial and Attorney Rules of Conduct, to recommend that the state review its investigative process in this case and respond as to why the complainant was not charged for withholding her commissions and other actual monies owed, at least Class C misdemeanors, and as to why the complainant's wife and then fiance was not charged with assault and to proceed forthwith with such charges against them and in support there of states:

    1. That the defendant presently is charged with the offense of harassment by telephone, 720 ILCS 135/1-1.
    2. That the state had ample opportunity to investigate the complainant during his complaining process.
    3. That the complainant withheld the defendant's commissions and other monies actually owed at the time of her termination which the state can ascertain:
      1. By questioning Jane Doe, a bookkeeper of Wrox and in charge of payroll at the time of the defendant's wrongful termination.
      2. By questioning any employee of the Wrox academic department, beginning with John Doe.
      3. From the defendant's Affidavit In Support Of Monies Complainant Owes Defendant.

3.That the complainant's wife, then fiance, Amy Maclean nee Greenman, did assault the defendant, threaten her, steal her property and destroy it in the presence of security guards of 29 S. Lasalle in Chicago Illinois as reported to the Chicago police on September 23, 1999 by the defendant in this case.

4. Whereas the state did not provide equal protection under the law and instead exhibited class bias in siding with an extremely wealthy businessman, the complainant, over a lower-middle class worker, the defendant, to charge this worker with a crime and thus effect her abilities to collect her actual money owed and later punitive damages in civil litigation.

WHEREFORE, the defendant moves this court to grant the motion of a prosecutorial investigative review of this case and that the state cure its defects of selective prosecution by pressing charges against Adam Maclean and Amy Maclean nee Greenman.

 

________________
Defendant, Pro Se

 

 

 

 

   

Return To M M M  Motions Index Page

 

Return To M M M  Wrox Persecutes Jane Doe Pages

 

Return To M M M Index Page

 

Return to Home Page