NOW COMES the defendant, Gale A., by pro se, and still upon her word as a Judaic-Christian and under penalties of perjury as in numerous filings in this case before a notary and serves notice and demand that:

1. She has turned Prosecuting Attorney Jeremy Brenman into the United States Department of Justice, locally and in Washington DC, for his known, close, public, suspicious and RICO-like association with Patti Eshaei, known committer of criminal prosecutorial "misconduct" against the defendant who caused the defendant an illegal incarceration in retaliation for the defendant defending herself too well and who is off her case but to the best knowledge and belief of the defendant is still influencing it through her relationship with Brenman. In this case, Brenman has consistently shown disregard for the laws and processes of which he turns around and enforces upon the people -- one class of the people, that is -- and this defendant has no reason to trust that Brenman, particularly in regards with his huddling relationship to Eshaei, has behaved properly in this case when double standards among these prosecutors have proven to be the order of the day.
2. She has turned Jeremy Brenman into various lawyer/judge complaint organizations for his suspicious association with Patti Eshaei as well as his stalling in providing verbally ordered discovery and verbally ordered bill of particulars -- too late now for a speedy or acceptable manner so that the defendant can fairly and properly prepare for a trial -- and for his possible involvement in the "disappearing" motion of February 24, 2000 to advance her case and according to his verbal promise to her on February 17, 2000 that she would receive her discovery in "two weeks": today is March 17, 2000 -- a full month since this off the record conversation.
3. She has begun a Federal Civil Rights suit against Patti Eshaei and Judge George Smith and plans to subpoena Jeremy Brenman as a witness, as he is a known and public partner of Patti Eshaei.
4. She was promised a speedy disposition of this case and a settlement by the State by a Prosecuting Attorney by the name of Diedra Cato, yet Diedra Cato never contacted the defendant nor responded to the defendant in any manner, never made a single attempt at negotiation, even though the defendant submitted settlements that were fair and were reasonable for all concerned parties, including the misbehaving prosecutor and judge of Branch 46, and Diedra Cato was not there at the court date to discuss the settlement on March 16, 2000 where there was no discussion, just a blanket refusal of settlements and no negotiations or counter offers were ever made.
5. She will subpoena Diedra Cato as a witness in her Federal Civil Rights suit, as Diedra Cato did move in to take responsibility of this case on March 9, 2000 on account of the criminal misbehavior of Eshaei and then dropped the ball for reasons unknown and unexplained to the defendant, who is receiving prejudicially less respect and regard than an attorney would receive had the defendant an attorney representing her -- this against various Supreme Court Rules and cases protecting Pro Se defendants.
6. She has also turned Diedra Cato into those same officials as mentioned in paragraphs 1 and 2, for her agreeing to help settle and dispose of this case, then never following up with the defendant on said promise and not appearing in court to offer any explanation on March 16, 2000 or to carry through on this case after stepping up to assume responsibility in it, her behavior smacking of suspiciousness and the possibility that she took bribes and/or quid pro quo from extremely wealthy and influential complainant Maclean et al and/or was unduly influenced by criminally misbehaving Eshaei, whom as a known commmitter of criminal conduct herself has no business being a prosecutor against others with little to no protection against her abusiveness, while along with her partner prosecuting States Attorneys has been mocking and disregarding the Pro Se defendant and the rights of the pro Se defendant.
7. As a Pro Se defendant, the defendant has reasonable knowledge, belief and proof that she is and has been receiving obvious and blatant misconduct at the least on the part of partnering prosecuting attorneys who have fully disregarded her rights for a fair and speedy trial since day one of this case and continuing up to this present moment.
8. As a Pro Se defendant, she has been refused fair dispositions of this case from every States Attorney who has touched this case to date, that she is blatantly and obviously being railroaded while receiving illegal and extra legal retaliations for simply defending herself in a case that no competent and "untouchable" prosecutor would have ever even pursued in the first place.
9. She serves notice and demand that neither Jeremy Brenman nor Diedra Cato, themselves as incompetent prosecutors and/or in league with known incompetent prosecutor Patti Eshaei, known criminal abuser of her position and railroader against this defendant, may have any further jurisdiction over her in this case or any other case involving the defendant as such would constitute a conflict of interest.

________________
Defendant, Pro Se