NOW COMES the defendant, Gale A., by pro se, and still upon her word as a Judaic-Christian and under penalties of perjury as in numerous filings in this case before a notary and asks the court according to Federal and State Constitutional Law, and to Laws from Moses and in the interest of Justice, to compel the State to disclose its relationship with Robert Greenman in full and states:

1. That the defendant presently is charged with one count of harassment by telephone, 720 ILCS 135/1-1 and one count of harassment by electronic media, 720 ILCS 135/1-2.
2. That if the Court finds this motion frivolous and gives a reasonable explanation as to this judgment, that upon agreement with the Court's judgment but not before, the defendant will consider withdrawing this motion.
3. That one complainant -- Adam Maclean -- is very wealthy and from the U.K.
4. That the new complainant and co-conspirator against the defendant -- Robert Greenman, ex-U.S. Navy Commander, is now the President of Wrox and father-in-law of Adam Maclean.
5. That Adam Maclean, the original complainant in this case, moved back to the U.K., leaving his father-in-law Robert Greenman, ex-U.S. Navy Commander in charge as President of Wrox -- Maclean's choice for a proclaimed "democratic" President of Wrox, but whom according to various employees and ex-employees of Wrox, has exhibited little in the way of democracy and/or respect towards them.
6. That Greenman has ties with the U.S. government and other governing agencies and the wealthy classes, being an ex-commander of the U.S. Navy and the father-in-law of a U.K. plutocrat.
7. That Greenman came to court on February 10, 2000, as did the defendant, when the case was continued because Judge O'Malley was not present.
8. That the defendant recognized Mr. Greenman as she once or twice had the distinct unpleasure to meet him.
9. That Greenman, who took U.S. Naval oaths to uphold the Constitution, has purportedly actually fought to uphold the Constitution, which among other things guarantees U.S. sovereign citizens freedom of speech, willfully and gladly placed further charges against the defendant in this case, when the defendant has committed no crimes whatsoever and when his daughter, Amy Greenman, stands to financially and wrongfully and egotistically benefit from the defendant's being "charged" in this case and also being found guilty and who also committed assault crimes against the defendant but was never charged -- a further incidence of selective prosecution in this case, which the defendant does in no regard whatsoever deem frivolous.
10. That since Greenman's entrance into this debacle of the State charging a lower-middle class U.S. sovereign on behalf of a U.K. plutocrat who not only stole from her but loudly brags about it, the defendant's motions have been deemed "frivolous" and the Court has rushed to judgment on her motions, combining these motions with jury selection process, a move that the defendant objects to.
11. That the defendant wants full disclosure on Mr. Greenman's relationship, near, close, far, hardly there, to anyone in the State's Attorney Office and/or of the Court that could impinge on her ability to get impartial treatment by ANY Court representative or functionary or have her case just ever so slightly influenced by some finger dripping with money, wealth, class, power, job status which can tip the scales of justice just ever so slightly and even so, unfairly, in her case and which have already been influenced by the Maclean clan wealth to prosecute her but not to prosecute Maclean.