NOW COMES the defendant, by Pro Se, to request that the court, in the interest of Justice and in compliance with various Freedom of Information Acts, compel information on any and all of the Assistant State's Attorneys involved in this case and in support thereof states:

1. That the defendant presently is charged with the offense of harassment by telephone, 720 ILCS 135/1-1.
2. That "the State's Attorney is an advocate for the people of the state of Illinois, and represents everyone, including the defendant", S.H.A. ch 110A, Rule 1-101.
3. That the defendant has no knowledge of any and all of the Assistant State's Attorneys, representatives and agents who are prosecuting her for the state by name and/or credentials.
4. That the defendant is representing herself in this charge against her by Pro Se and has been instructed by the court on November 18, 1999 that she is to be held at the same standards as licensed, practicing attorneys, including those charged with the duties of prosecuting her.
5. That the Clerk for the Circuit Court of Cook County will supply the defendant with transcripts of cases only by case number or name of defendant.
6. That the defendant is not working and cannot afford access to Westlaw nor Lexus Nexus databases to more vigorously search cases.
7. That the defendant is entitled to get this information in as expeditious and fair manner as possible in order to proceed to trial.
8. Whereas the defendant wants the names and resumes of those listed in paragraph 3 of this motion.
9. Whereas the defendant wants those listed in paragraph 3 of this motion to list any and all charges brought against any and/or all of them before any disciplinary groups, with special emphasis around issues of prosecutorial misconduct, over-zealousness, withholding of evidence beneficial to defendants, selective prosecution and vindictive prosecution.
10. Whereas the defendant wants those listed in paragraph 3 of this motion to list any and all complaints brought against any and/or all of them before any disciplinary groups with special emphasis around issues of prosecutorial misconduct, over-zealous prosecution, withholding of evidence beneficial to defendants, selective prosecution and vindictive prosecution.
11. Whereas the defendant wants to know of any and all lawsuits brought against any of those listed in paragraph 3 of this motion.
12. Whereas the defendant wants to know three (3) names and/or case numbers of defendants prosecuted for making a telephone call with the intent to harass whose cases proceeded to jury trial and a jury trial was held and those mentioned in paragraph 3 were prosecuting or were involved in the prosecution, for each of those mentioned.
13. Whereas the defendant wants to know up to three (3) names/or case numbers of defendants prosecuted for the same type of crime, by classification, whose cases proceeded to jury trial and a jury trial was held and those mentioned in paragraph 3 were prosecuting or were involved in the prosecution, for each of those mentioned. This is only if there are not sufficient cases mentioned in paragraph 12 to comply with this request.

WHEREFORE, the defendant moves this court to grant the motion for information on any and all prosecution agents in this case by date certain.