NOW COMES the defendant, Gale A, by pro se, and still upon her word as a Judaic-Christian and under penalties of perjury as in numerous filings in this case before a notary and asks the court and the state to amend her previous motion and previous amendment for information about prosecuting attorneys and states:

1. That if the Court finds this second amendment to the motion for Competent Prosecution frivolous, that the defendant respectfully objects to that in advance, asks for the motion to stand for appellate review of its merits and will accept whatever sanction the Court deems necessary to put upon her in her disagreement of this motion's frivolity vs. meritorious factors. "Blessed are those who are persecuted for the sake of justice". St. Matthew.
2. That prosecuting attorneys continuously refuse to tell the defendant their names while rough-riding over her Civil Rights in this case and while winking at the real criminals in this case because they are wealthy and white-collar, the courtrooms are full of the lack of white-collar defendants and this appears systemic not accidental -- violating her rights to equal protection under the law and how many others' rights to equal protection under the law?
3. That the defendant has every legal right to seek any number of remedies against wrongful prosecutions, abusive, incompetent, over-zealous and maltreatment of her by any attorneys, prosecuting or otherwise, and in order for her to seek such redress, she is entitled to the names of these attorneys -- they are public officials in powerful positions and they are accountable, and seem to need reminding that this is the United States of America, not Peru, and that defendants are INNOCENT by the law these prosecutors are sworn to uphold until and unless proven guilty in this country and defendants are fully entitled to their rights less the wrongfully accused be harmed and end up suffering undeserved punishments, in which case the drivers of the prosecution train are in serious spiritual trouble, beyond any amounts of redress the wrongfully accused can ultimately obtain.

That if the court wants to uphold the prosecuting attorneys anonymity that it explain to the defendant in open court how and why this is allowable in the United States of America so that should the people find this unacceptable that they can take action to change it.